Changes in the Uropygial (preen) gland in Fulani ecotype chicken (gallus gallus domestica) a post-hatch study

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Alhaji Zubair Jaji ¹
• Latifah Abdulkarim ¹
• Nathan Ahmadu Furo ²
• Esther Solomon Kigir ¹
• Kenechukwu Tobechukwu Onwuama ¹
• Abdulganiu Olawale Ibrahim ¹
• Shaibu Mohammed Atabo ³
• Sulaiman Olawoye Salami ³
• Nathaniel Wanmi ¹

¹ Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

² Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

³ Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.

10.22067/ijvst.2025.87643.1370

Abstract

The Uropygial (Preen) gland, located dorsocranially to the pygostyle and rectrices in birds, is a bi-lobed structure responsible for secreting oil for plumage maintenance. This study investigated the morphological and histological features during post-natal development in the Fulani Ecotype chicken (Gallus gallus domestica) with the aim of documenting anatomical information that will be useful for further biomedical and embryological studies. A total of 56 Fulani Ecotype chickens were sampled, and studied across four developmental phases, with each phase comprising 7 males and 7 females. For each bird, live body weight, uropygial gland weights and preen oil weights were documented. Morphometric characteristics of the excised gland were documented before extraction  and measuring the preen oil. Additionally, uropygial glands from selected birds per phase were excised, and fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution for gross and histological analysis. The gland appeared as early as week 2–3 post-hatch, presenting two pear shaped lobes and a short papilla. Three layers of the secretory cells were recognised at 7-8 months post hatch. The results confirm that uropygial gland of the Fulani ecotype chicken develops early, at week 2-3 post hatch, and that its weight increases with the body weight, reaching full histological development between 7-8 months post hatch.    

Keywords

• Histology
• Morphology
• Post Hatch
• Uropygial gland

Main Subjects

• Anatomy

---

References

1.   Ajala AO, Ogunjimi SI, Famuwagun OS and Adebimpe AT. 2021. Poultry production in Nigeria: exploring its potentials for rural youth empowerment and entrepreneurship. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 48(10):114-123. Doi:10.51791/njap.v48i1.2890. 
2.   Adeyonu A, Okunola A., Alao M., Oyawoye E and Okonkwo C. 2021. An assessment of broiler value chain in Nigeria. Open Agriculture, 6 (1) 296-307. Doi:10.515/opag-2020-0168. 
3.   Odubote K. 2015. The Local Chickens Of Nigeria-A Review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276058544 (accessed 6.4.2024). Doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.2193.5520. 
4.   Adeleke MA, Bello KO, Akinyemi IO, Irekhore OT, Ilori BM, Adeyeye OA and Famakinde SA. 2022. Morphological variations of qualitative and quantitative traits of Fulani ecotype chickens in Nigeria. Genetika 54 (1): 43-62. Doi:10.2298/GENSR2201043A. 
5.   Giraudeau M, Duval C, Guillon N. 2010. Effects of access to preen gland secretions on mallard plumage. Nature weissen schaften, 97(6) 577-581. Doi:10.1007/s00114-010-0673-z. 
6.   Reynolds SM, Castro I, Alley MR. 2017. Apteryx Spp. (Kiwi) possess an uropygial gland: Anatomy and Pathology. European Journal of Anatomy. 21 (2): 125-139. 
7.   Ushakumary S, Venkatesan S, Sabiha HB. 2011. Histoloy and histochemistry of the preen gland in guinea fowl. Indian Veterinary Journal, 88(6), 132–134.
8.   Harem I, Kocak M, Kozlu T. 2010. Histologic Structure of the Uropygial Gland of the Osprey(Pandion haliaetus ). Journal of Zoo Wildlife Medicine, 41(1), 147–150. Doi:10.16.1638/2008-0205.1. 
9    Sandilands V, Powell K, Keeling LJ, Savory J. 2004. Preen gland function in layer fowls: Factors affecting preen oil fatty acid composition. British Poultry Science, 45 (1):109-15. Doi:10.1080/0071660410001668932. 
10.  Moreno-Rueda G. 2017. Preen oil and bird fitness: a critical review of the evidence. Biological Reviews. Doi:10.1111/brv.12324. 
11.  Rajathi S, Ashok N, Kumaravel A, Muthkrishnan S. 2013. Histological Development of papilla of preen gland in Duck. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy, 90 (7): 56-58. 
12. Al-khazraji KI. 2017. Histological and Morphological study of the Uropygial gland in Gull (Larus canus). Diyala Journal of Pure Science, 13 (3): 230-239.     Doi:10.24237/djPS.1303.308a. 
13.  Johnston DW. 1988. A morphological atlas of the avian gland. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History. Zoology, 54, 199–259.
14.  Moller AP, Laursen, K. 2019. Function of the Uropygial gland in eiders (Somateria mollissima). Avian Research 10, 24. Doi:10.1186/s40657-019-0163-8.  
     15.  Jawad HSA, Naji LHBI, Bakar SA. 2015. Partial Ablation of Uropygial Gland Effect on Production Performance of Akar Putra Chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science, 14 (4), 213–221. Doi:10.3923/ijps.2015.213.221. 
16.  Das LN, Mishra DB, Biswal G. 1962. Comparative anatomy of the domestic duck (Anas bochas). Indian Veterinary Journal, 42: 320-326.
17.  Delius JD. 1988. Preening and associated comfort behavior in birds. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 525: 40–55. Doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb38594.x. 
18.  Cotgreave P, Clayton DH. 1994. Comparative-analysis of time spent grooming by birds in relation to parasite load. Behaviour, 131 (3-):171–187. Doi:10.1163/156853994X00424. 
19.  Van LDW, Bokma S. 1987. Short-term feather maintenance as a function of dust-bathing in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 18, 197—204. Doi:10.1016/0168-1591(87)90193-6. 
20.  Shawkey MD, Pillai SR, Hill GE. 2003. Chemical Warfare Effects of Uropygial Oil on Feather Degrading Bacteria. Avian Biology, 34 (4):345–349. 
21.  Stettenheim PR. 2000. The integumentary morphology of modern birds – an overview. Am Zoology, 40, 461–477. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/40/4/461/101379. 
22.  Wanmi N, Samuel MO, Byanet O. 2016. Morphormetric Study of the Forebrain and Cerebellum of the Wild Rock Pigeon (Columba livia). International journal of Vet. Sci. 5(3): 118-121. 
23.  Gosomji IJ, Salami SO, Nzalak JO, Kawu MU, Tizhe E.M, Gurumyem YG, Dung EC.2015. Morphological Development of the Gastrointestinal Tract Of Helmeted Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) at Pre-Hatch and Post-Hatch. Journal of Vet. Anatomy 8(2)17 – 27. Doi:10.1155/2016/9827956. 

24.   Sara Q, Cecilia M, Chiara, D, Alexandra MG, Giovanni D. 2006. Adaptive evolution of secretory cell lines in vertebrate skin. Caryologia, 59 (2): 187-206. Doi:10.1080/00087114.2006.10797915. 
25.  Mobini B, Ziaii A. 2011. Comparative histological study of the preen of broiler and native chicken. Journal of Veterinary Microbiology  6 (2 (20)): 121–128. 
26.  Rajathi S, Ashok N, Kumaravel A, Muthukrishnan S. 2014. Post hatch micrometrical development of the preen gland in the duck. Indian Veterinary Journal. 91 (7) : 51-53. 
27.   Sadoon AH. 2011. Histological study of European Starling uropygial gland (Sturnus vulgaris). International Journal of Poultry Science, 10 (8): 662–664. Doi:10.3923/ijps.2011.662.664. 
28.  Hassanin A, Shoeib M, Massoud D. 2021. Micro and Macroanatomical features of the uropygial gland of duck (Anas platyrrhynchos) and pigeon (Columba livia). Biotechnic and Histochemistry, 96 (93), 213-222. Doi:10.1080/10520295.2020.1782990. 
29.  Isbilir F, Avci Kupeli Z, Isbilir I, Arican I, Ozyigit O. 2024. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of uropygial gland of Budgerigars (Melosittacus undulatus). Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research, 8 (1): 43-51. Doi:10.47748/tjvr.1393777. 
 30.  Sawad AA. 2006. Morphological and histological study of uropygial gland in moorhen (G. gallinula C. choropus). International Journal of Poultry Science, 5 (10): 938–941. Doi:10.3923/ijps.2006.938.941.